Sorry about the confusion with the google drive - here's the real link!
WS AP English Lit & Comp
Saturday, September 27, 2014
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
more on archetypes
Hey everyone -- check out this cool site that Jenah found! It references common tropes in a variety of media, and thus works well for thinking about archetypes....
Sunday, August 17, 2014
WT presentation grading
G12 AP English Lit/Comp
The White Tiger
Fact ya Fiction?
Breakdown
This project
will assess your understanding of The
White Tiger and allow you to reach out to the local community. The full
project will be worth 100 points total:
20 points: your individual
contribution to your group’s efforts
To assess
this, I will look at your explanations of your involvement in the project, as
well as the quality of your section of the final project. I will also look at
your use of public speaking techniques that you’ve been developing the past
several years (pacing, eye contact, volume, expression, etc.).
30 points: the overall
effectiveness of your group presentation
To assess
this, I will ask these questions:
1. Does the
project meet the goal of holding up a community member’s experiences to Balram’s
experiences?
2. Is the
presentation organized so that it’s easy to follow and understand?
3. Does the
presentation hold the audience’s attention?
50 points: your individual
composition and argument (the letter)
To assess
this, I will ask these questions:
1. Does the
letter make an argument about Adiga’s text (whether it’s accurate or not)?
2. Does the
writer use good reasoning and evidence in putting forth his or her claim?
3. Is the
letter structured logically?
4. Is the
letter written well?
Please do
notify me if you have problems with your group members in collaborating on this
project.
Wednesday, August 13, 2014
some readings of "Snow White"
You tried your hand at interpreting "Snow White" through your literary lens -- nice work!
To see what some other people have done (and some are more credible than others), check out these readings if you're interested...
Archetypal: http://www.jungatlanta.com/articles/summer07-archetypal-patterns.pdf
(This also addresses a bit of psychoanalytical measures.)
Psychoanalytical: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1990-24891-001
(This is a tough one - actually in a literary journal, Signs. Focuses on mother/daughter relationships in a feminist and psychoanalytical reading. Click on the link under "Links" to get the full text.)
Marxist: http://blackinkquill.wordpress.com/2013/08/23/critical-appraisal-of-little-snow-white-the-original-snow-white-grimm-version/
(This is from a blogger, so take that as you will... It's quite an interesting application of Marxist principles to the text, though I'm not sure I buy it.)
Historicist: Alas, I have not found anything in my cursory search.... If I do, I'll post it soon!
To see what some other people have done (and some are more credible than others), check out these readings if you're interested...
Archetypal: http://www.jungatlanta.com/articles/summer07-archetypal-patterns.pdf
(This also addresses a bit of psychoanalytical measures.)
Psychoanalytical: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1990-24891-001
(This is a tough one - actually in a literary journal, Signs. Focuses on mother/daughter relationships in a feminist and psychoanalytical reading. Click on the link under "Links" to get the full text.)
Marxist: http://blackinkquill.wordpress.com/2013/08/23/critical-appraisal-of-little-snow-white-the-original-snow-white-grimm-version/
(This is from a blogger, so take that as you will... It's quite an interesting application of Marxist principles to the text, though I'm not sure I buy it.)
Historicist: Alas, I have not found anything in my cursory search.... If I do, I'll post it soon!
Sunday, August 10, 2014
lit theory help
If you want some good resources for lit theory / critical lenses, you can check out these:
Dr. Kristi Siegel's excellent intro to literary theory. Each entry gives a briefing and some resources.
The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory & Criticism. This is a great resource - if you go to Table of Contents and then click on "view entries" you can search via alphabetical order.
The University of Toronto pages. Search alphabetically, again.
Dr. Kristi Siegel's excellent intro to literary theory. Each entry gives a briefing and some resources.
The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory & Criticism. This is a great resource - if you go to Table of Contents and then click on "view entries" you can search via alphabetical order.
The University of Toronto pages. Search alphabetically, again.
From: http://xkcd.com/451/ |
Wednesday, July 30, 2014
white tiger reflections
To get you in the habit of
using our class blogs, and to have you work on critically reflecting on others’
ideas, AND to help you prepare for next Monday's discussion, your HW is to read
through several of your classmates’ blog posts on White Tiger and respond to
them.
Step
1: First go to your own blog (or
email) and read your five posts, even if you just wrote them this week! J This will remind you of what you took away from Adiga’s book.
Step 2: Go to this page to see the full list of Grade 12 blogs.
Step
3: Take some time to read
through your classmates’ blogs on WT
– you can visit several and read one post to get a feel, or just focus in on
one or two blogs.
Step
4: After reading around, choose
one person’s work to study. Re-read their blog posts carefully, and take note
of your thoughts throughout. Consider these questions:
1. Where do your thoughts on
or reactions to the book converge or align?
2. Where do you conflict with
the writer’s thoughts/reactions?
3. What do you think is the
source of this conflict? Differing interpretations? Differing worldviews?
Stereotyping? Educational background? Other? What do you make of the conflict?
4. Do you learn anything from
the blogs? Do you have areas of contention with the writer’s interpretations?
You’re not meant to answer
all these questions, but it’s a starting point if you’re having trouble
processing their ideas.
The upshot is this: You will
need to write a blog post this weekend
in which you respond to your chosen focus-subject’s response to WT. You can respond however you like
– except that you must be polite in any critiques you offer. NOTE: I am not requiring
you to critique their work, but to respond…
You will be graded on the
three Cs. Think of this as a way for me to see where your minds are at the moment.
J
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)